Bangalore |  Mysore |  Mumbai |  Pune |  Hyderabad |  Kolkata |  Delhi  
Indian Classics |  Profiles  |  Fixtures |  Video |  Archives |  Public Pulse |  In & Around |  Specials |  International |  Home  
Loading....
in   
 
News    Send comment   Send E-mail   Print the page

Fynbos Springs to Life – As the Season Sleepwalks Along

  June 16 , 2025
   

In a season where the thrill of racing seems to be held hostage, Fynbos finally gave fans something to cheer, well, at least momentarily. After a forgettable opening act where she wilted tamely behind Sovereign King, the Pesi Shroff-trained filly decided to remind us why hype can sometimes be justified. In a large field, jockey Trevor Patel gave a textbook ride—one Shroff himself would approve of—navigating the traffic like a pro cabbie in Mumbai, then cruising past her only serious rival, Bishop, in the final furlong.

Yes, in racing, the logic is often upside down: the bigger the field, the clearer the outcome. Fynbos flopped in a cozy field and then aced this crowded mess. Go figure.

Fynbos` win was particularly pleasing not just because she finally lived up to her bloodlines—being a full sister to Zuccaro, who bloomed fashionably late—but because she did it on a track labelled ‘soft` that looked anything but. Her timing of 1 minute 37.90 seconds was eye-catching, even if the going was supposedly more “soft sponge cake” than firm turf. Someone might want to recalibrate that track penetrometer.

Pesi Shroff, meanwhile, continues to operate like a seasoned Test match batsman—consistently racking up classic wins while rivals are still figuring out which end of the bat to hold. His stable is so deep that his runners often look like they`re auditioning for a clean sweep rather than competing.

While Fynbos` Derby hopes look as bright as ever, the Colts Trials Stakes will provide better clarity. That race promises a genuine contest, with Sovereign King, Circle of Dreams, Big Bay, and others lined up.

Positano, racing`s answer to that charming friend who always promises to show up but leaves you stranded at the bar. Once again, the punters fell for the romantic notion that past classic placings somehow equal present performance. Once again, they were ghosted.

Installed as the firm favourite in the 1400 metres Stewards Cup, Positano delivered the usual: a flattering reputation and a deflating result. In contrast, Mandarino—another who hadn`t found the winner`s enclosure since Diwali—sprinted clear like he suddenly remembered how to gallop. Trainer Irfan Ghatala pulled off yet another guessing game masterclass, with Mandarino clocking in with a ‘won as he pleased` finish, jockey Sandesh doing the honours. Positano? Still a puzzle, and perhaps not worth solving.

If Sunday had some redeeming moments, Saturday`s card was a bit of a damp squib, with only six races cobbled together. Whatever happened to the eight-race summer standard? Whether it`s the prospectus, the trainers, or just a collective lack of enthusiasm, one thing is certain—the summer buzz is missing. And despite a healthy influx of outstation horses, the action on the track feels about as exclusive as a neighbourhood gym.

Still, a few stars flickered: Vyasa, trained by Darius Byramji, notched a hat-trick, while Akitania from James McKeown`s yard dazzled in a dominant win. The Multitude brigade came good early on, including Star of India and Indian Brocade, who put low-grade fields to the sword with clinical ease.

In contrast, the Justice Medappa Memorial Trophy saw Trevor Patel channelling his inner sloth on Don Carlos, allowing Diablo to sneak up and snatch victory by a whisker. Meanwhile, Ebotse erased memories of a poor last run with a performance that had punters wondering if it was even the same horse. Smile of Beauty, yet another short-priced fancy from the Dominic yard, flattered before fading—a recurring theme that has now become part of the weekend entertainment.

Eight Days, One Washout – and Still No Spark

With eight days of racing (one lost to rain), the summer season feels more like a long, tired exhale than a burst of adrenaline. What once defined elite competition has turned into a formulaic affair—predictable winners, tame opposition, and a betting market that`s been more misleading than enlightening.

Sure, there have been moments of promise. But so far, the season feels like it`s been wrapped in cotton wool, safely avoiding any real drama. Let`s hope the Colts Championship Stakes and the Bangalore Derby can inject some much-needed vigour into the proceedings.

 
 
  Post your comments   E-mail   Print
Total Comments : 12
Posted by Rukshad on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Well there are 2 sides of a coin n there is 2 ways to look at the last run of Fynbos...yes as Vispi pointed out the horse got squeeze at the railing and the other side of Sharan the horse lost by widening margin of 6 lengths...

Now just my viewpoint...Vispi, Trevor has an uncanny act on fav wherein he would deliberately put the horse in precarious position wherein he would put the fav horse behind wall of horses time n again just to prove it was bad luck n than loose on the post...

Sharan Fynbos 1400mts was a sharp distance for me I feel...my assessment trainer kept the horse entry in wrong distance for best known to him...a mile n beyond is the right distance for the horse running style n pedigree is concerned...

Nonetheless it`s been a lucky horse for a punter like me...when layed horse lost n when played won...so make no mistake I ain`t talking from my pocket...

Above is just my observation n nothing malicious about my intent... cherrrrs
 
Posted by Racing Analyst on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Dear Vispi,
How exactly should the writer read the race? Fynbos may have suffered interference, but she lost — and lost convincingly. Does that mean we now disregard the winner’s effort? Should we declare the victory a fluke, a mere default, just because the favourite had a rough passage?

Do you believe races always unfold according to plan? That favourites are guaranteed a clear run? Racing doesn’t work that way. Champions are defined by their ability to overcome adversity, not by excuses.

It’s understandable that owners and followers grow emotionally attached to their horses and find it hard to accept defeat. That’s your prerogative. But the writer has a different responsibility — to stay detached and present the facts as they unfolded on the track, not as they were hoped to be.

 
Posted by Prasanna Joshi on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Sovereign King`s run in Poonawala million was eye catching and suggested an extra furlong would suit him, 3yo Fillies conceding weight to colts rarely win, here the difference was 3 kgs and if we add sex allowance it is 4.5 kgs. This is a time and tested formula. Handicap races are the best to wager and terms races are best to sit and enjoy racing and admire the winning horses and owners and trainers..
 
Posted by Rukshad on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Also Sharan one more point u need to bring to everyone attention and that is these sort of invariability in results are bound to happen only coz owners trainers are investing loads of heavy cash during the purchases of the horses be it during auctions or private sale`s...

Owners have to recoup their investment...avg cost of a decent horse is no less than 30lakhs...price money on offer other than classic races are meager...let`s say a 3yr old race fetches 5lakhs to the winner, inorder to recover the investment amt the owner has to win 6times...it`s highly impossible or improbable scenario...so what n where can an owner make profit than is a multi million dollars question?

Only way out is to lay their fav big time that`s the easiest n best option isn`t?

Coming to the point Breeders are there to sell their crops at min price which itself is far to big of margin...the bug needs to stop there only than a fair racing can be expected but not guaranteed still...

Rest running of the races is farce when stewards are hand in glow with the big wigs in the game...

Still remember the times when ur horse was under the care of B.Puttana...those were the days of racing...now it`s all about doosra, teesra...

GST is major killer blow, syndicate option not there for normal public in India...just take e.g of British racing...horse called She`s Perfect...new racing owner syndicate are living their dream...

Lots to learn n desire from other countries if one has to put indian racing on global map... doubtful but still hopeful...luv from Dxb...
 
Posted by Truth Be Told on ( June 16 , 2025 )
By obsessively clinging to Trevor Patel’s “moment of madness” as the grand cause of Fynbos’s downfall, Vispi Patel seems determined to write a tragedy where the script clearly read thriller. In doing so, he effectively robs Sovereign King of the spotlight — a horse who, unlike the overhyped favourite, actually turned up and got the job done. Fynbos? She mailed it in.

Yes, things go wrong in horse racing — it’s not synchronized swimming. But using bad luck or alleged interference as a fig leaf to cover a six-length thrashing? That’s not analysis, that’s denial dressed as drama. Real racegoers — the ones who’ve seen it all and don’t need a violins-and-tears explanation every time a favourite flops — know how to take defeat on the chin and tip their hats to the better horse on the day. That’s racing, not revisionist storytelling.
 
Posted by Dark Legend on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Yes, yes — we all saw the interference. Thank you, Captain Obvious. That’s precisely why Fynbos went out as the favourite — two wins at Mumbai and a reputation polished to a shine, until the jockey decided to test out new traffic patterns mid-race. The result? A performance best filed under forgettable debuts and how to ruin them.

Sure, the opening act was a disaster, but punters — being the eternal optimists or gluttons for punishment — chose to believe lightning wouldn’t strike twice. They backed her like she was the second coming of Jacqueline, not a filly with a marred resumé. So really, where’s the crime in reading a race the way it was supposed to play out?

There’s no wrong race reading here. Just a wrong turn by the jockey and a cold reminder that potential means nothing when a horse runs like it forgot the plot. It happens. That`s racing. But let’s not pretend the entire planet misread the form book just because Sovereign King decided to gatecrash the narrative.

 
Posted by Murari on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Hehe Rukshad, not everyone needs to make Horseracing a paying "business".
I think you`ll find young Mr. Patel (and more than a few others in Bombay/Poona, Calcutta and Madras) can buy a horse with a single afternoon`s income from his Law Practice. :-)
Interesting discussion in the comments section.

 
Posted by Vispi Patel on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Sharan, you really need to be more factual and less dramatic in your reporting. Our filly didn’t wilt tamely to Sovereign King. Trevor opted to go for a gap between the rail and the leader which closed and she had to be pulled up at the 300m mark.
We tend to let our horses do the talking so I won’t deliberate on the outcome had Fynbos had a clear run, but try reporting factually. Learn to read a race. Unfortunately you seem not to, and I for one don’t have time to help you get better at that!! In fact wouldn’t even if I did.
Vispi patel

 
Posted by Sharan Kumar on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Yes, Fynbos encountered an issue during the race. But let’s not overlook the fact — the winner finished a commanding six lengths clear. A true champion overcomes adversity; that’s the hallmark of greatness. Let’s deal in facts, not emotions — especially if you’re speaking as a part-owner. Excuses don’t rewrite the result. And surely, after all these years, I don`t need schooling from someone interpreting the race solely through their lens. Every loser has an excuse — that’s nothing new.
 
Posted by Storm Cat on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Vispi Patel`s comments are hilarious. Fynbos lost by six lengths to Sovereign King. There is no free passage for horses, and champions need to find their way. The fact of the matter is that Fynbos put up a disappointing performance. You are emphatic that, because of interference, Fynbos lost. That is to be proved when these two run together. Someone might say Trevor deliberately ran into a problem to prevent the favourite from winning. Every race can produce a different result. There is nothing certain about horse racing. The best horses have lost for one reason or the other.
 
Posted by Blinkered Bard on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Fynbos was the strong favourite.
Fynbos did lose by six lengths.
Punters did lose money.
And no amount of post-race reasoning — whether about traffic trouble, bad luck, or saddle slips — changes the result on the board.

When she returned to win next time out, it only highlighted what she should have done earlier. That’s racing: form, not feelings, dictates outcomes — especially when punters stake hard-earned money. Romanticising a loss doesn’t refund tickets or boost confidence. The job of a race analyst or writer is to state the facts, not play emotional violin for a beaten favourite.

So yes — excuses are fine for connections privately. But in public analysis, let results speak, not regrets.
 
Posted by Vispi Patel on ( June 16 , 2025 )
Yes Sharan I am biased especially to my good horses.
But that doesn’t take away from you needing to report correctly. Wilting tamely is v different from losing completely momentum and being virtually pulled up at a critical juncture of the race.
She wouldn’t have run at even money yesterday if that was indeed true.

 
Top
   
'


Live Results - Mysore, June 18 2025
 
Disclaimer: The views expressed in Reviews and Analysis depict the personal perspective of the authors only. The website does not subscribe to or endorse any of the same and is not responsible for adverse consequences. Every effort is made to provide accurate information, we are not responsible for any discrepancies that are beyond our control.
© 2008 Racing Pulse. All Rights Reserved. A Racingpulse Holdings Venture